Skip to main content
· 7/16/1992

Charles HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary of the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 1168
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16081
  • 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,659
  • 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 641
  • 1992 WL 163992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a four-month gap between plaintiff’s complaint and disciplinary letter “d[id] not sufficiently raise the inference that [plaintiff’s] filing was the reason for the adverse action”
  • affirming district court’s conclusion that four-month period between protected activity and adverse action, by itself, did not satisfy causation element for retaliation claim
  • granting summary judgment because disciplinary letter issued four months after discrimination charge filed insufficient causal link to employer action
  • determining that a twenty month period was insufficient
  • holding a four-month period insufficient
  • four-month gap between complaint and adverse action could not support a reasonable inference of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.