Skip to main content
· 12/7/1965

Charles, Henry & Crowley Co. Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 212 N.E.2d 240
  • 349 Mass. 723
  • 1965 Mass. LEXIS 798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the first aspect of the condition precedent test is met where the statement concerns “a fundamental fact” which the insurer considers in deciding to issue the policy
  • policy language made the accuracy of the answers in an application for a jeweler’s block a condition precedent to recovery
  • condition precedent identifying the value of property represented in answer to “Question 14B of the Proposal form”
  • policy language made fee accuracy of fee answers in an application for a jeweler’s block a condition precedent to recovery
  • “[A] statement made in an application for a policy of insurance may become a condition of the policy rather than remain a warranty or representation if ____”
  • \[A] statement made in an ___ application for a policy of insurance may become a condition of the policy rather than remain a warranty or representation if . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spalding, Cutter, Kirk, Spiegel, Reardon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.