· 12/7/1965
Charles, Henry & Crowley Co. Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.
Citations
- 212 N.E.2d 240
- 349 Mass. 723
- 1965 Mass. LEXIS 798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the first aspect of the condition precedent test is met where the statement concerns “a fundamental fact” which the insurer considers in deciding to issue the policy
- policy language made the accuracy of the answers in an application for a jeweler’s block a condition precedent to recovery
- condition precedent identifying the value of property represented in answer to “Question 14B of the Proposal form”
- policy language made fee accuracy of fee answers in an application for a jeweler’s block a condition precedent to recovery
- “[A] statement made in an application for a policy of insurance may become a condition of the policy rather than remain a warranty or representation if ____”
- \[A] statement made in an ___ application for a policy of insurance may become a condition of the policy rather than remain a warranty or representation if . . . .\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spalding, Cutter, Kirk, Spiegel, Reardon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.