Skip to main content
· 7/17/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 219 F.3d 555
  • 10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1367
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no ADA violation where claimant was denied medical treatment initially because he had to be disarmed by police not because he was mentally disabled
  • “Because the ADA sets forth the same remedies, procedures, and rights as the Rehabilitation Act, claims brought under both statutes may be analyzed together.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.