Charles H. Smith v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while “trial courts possess broad discretion to determine when the conduct of counsel is so improper as to warrant a new trial, ... attorneys also require latitude in formulating their arguments.” (citations omitted; internal quotations omitted)
• “Where two equally permissible inferences may be drawn from a single set of facts, we cannot conclude that no fair‐minded juror could reasonably infer” one of them.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).