Charles H. Schlobohm v. Pepperidge Farm, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under FAA, “[a] court must grant an order confirming the award unless it finds that the award should be vacated, modified, or corrected” per 9 U.S.C. § 10 or § 11
• finding under the facts of the case that the court “cannot say that either party prevailed”
• holding that neither party prevailed
• “This is not a case in which the parties have submitted their entire dispute to arbitration, thus arguably preventing the district court from modifying the award by adding pre-award interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).