· 1/15/1998
Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Robert Hood Attorney General of the State of California
Citations
- 133 F.3d 1240
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 519
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 377
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 452
- 1998 WL 10577
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no federal claim raised when “Keating argued in his reply brief that the jury instructions did not include a mens rea requirement, but did not argue that this omission violated the U.S. Constitution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Brunetti, Trott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.