Charles Gunn v. United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading § 12.32(a) as “list[ing] factors that are to be consid- ered in determining whether a wetland has been converted, such as whether woody hydrophytic vegetation has been re- moved”
• focusing on the notion that a person cannot “improve the land’s drainage”
• focusing on the notion that a person cannot \improve the land's drainage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).