Skip to main content
· 4/10/1992

Charles G. Boogaerts, D/B/A Boogaerts Company v. The Bank of Bradley, Lane Pierce, Randy Griffin and John Henderson

Citations

  • 961 F.2d 765
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1021
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6516
  • 1992 WL 71180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal is warranted when a party’s conduct was “in bad faith or deliberately intentional or willful”
  • “Although the sanction was imposed against the plaintiff, it is of no consequence that the discovery abuse perpetrated was by counsel rather than the plaintiff-client.”
  • “it is of no consequence that the discovery abuse perpetrated was by counsel rather than the plaintiff-client.”
  • “It is a well-established principle that a party is responsible for the actions and conduct of his counsel . . .”
  • “[I]t is of no consequence that the discovery abuse perpetrated was by counsel rather than the plaintiff-client.”
  • “Rule 37(b)(2)(C) authorizes the Court to exercise discovery abuse sanctions by dismissing a parties’ action, or striking pleadings or entering a default judgment against the abusive litigant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Bowman, Limbaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.