Skip to main content
· 4/5/2004

Charles Franklin Murdoch, Junior v. Roy A. Castro, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Citations

  • 365 F.3d 699
  • 64 Fed. R. Serv. 248
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6418
  • 2004 WL 720247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Today, we address a situation where a substantial showing has been made that, depending upon the content of Dinardo’s letter, the Confrontation Clause and attorney-client privilege are potentially at odds — a set of facts the Supreme Court has not yet examined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trott, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.