Charles F. Cutting v. Robert Muzzey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “[mjembers of a municipal planning board were not entitled to absolute immunity when imposing conditions on a developer because of racial animus
• concluding that the \[m]embers of a municipal planning board were not entitled to absolute immunity when imposing conditions on a developer because of racial animus\
• adopting the analysis in Developments in the Law—Zoning, 91 Harv.L.Rev. 1427, 1510-11 (1978) [3] , and concluding that the actions of town planning board, in imposing certain conditions upon the development of plaintiff's subdivision, were administrative
• denying quasi-judicial immunity to a planning board’s “routine exercise of administrative discretion”
• in related action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988, allegations that town officials were motivated by plaintiff’s plan to sell lots to those with Italian surnames saved action from dismissal
• planning board’s act directed at specific developer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).