Charles Edward Harris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining the relevant art of the claims in suit one looks to the nature of the problem confronting the inventor.” (citation omitted)
• further recognizing that a technological incompatibility that prevented the combination could be \telling on the issue of nonobviousness\ but the lack of economic feasability resulting from the combination would not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).