Skip to main content
· 7/24/1995

Charles E. Nicholson, Jr. And Margaret K. Nicholson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 1020
  • 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5701
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19601
  • 1995 WL 432404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that IRS could have discovered that its position was not justified had it “adequately investigated the case before issuing the Notice [of deficiency]”
  • noting that “[e]ven a cursory analysis of New Jersey law would have revealed the deficiency in [the Commissioner’s] position”
  • finding a lack of substantial justification where adequate investigation would have revealed erroneous assumptions
  • “The Commissioner cannot have a reasonable basis in both fact and law if it does not diligently investígate a case.”
  • superseded by an amendment to a burden of proof statute, IRC § 7430(c)(4)(B)
  • superseded by an amendment to a burden of proof statute, IRC § 7430(c)(4)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Nygaard, Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.