· 10/16/2014
Charles E. Mobley, Dante Carpenter, Gerald A. Thompkins v. United States
Citations
- 101 A.3d 406
- 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding a statement did not implicate a co-defendant by direct and obvious implication even though the declarant used a plural pronoun
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Thompson, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.