Skip to main content
· 10/16/2014

Charles E. Mobley, Dante Carpenter, Gerald A. Thompkins v. United States

Citations

  • 101 A.3d 406
  • 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a statement did not implicate a co-defendant by direct and obvious implication even though the declarant used a plural pronoun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Washington, Thompson, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.