Charles E. Chauvin v. Department of the Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that unauthorized possession of a metal plate and attempted removal of the plate from a shipyard were independent and separable acts
• stating a finding based on the demeanor of a witness, whether expressly or implicitly, cannot be overturned without \articulated sound reasons\ (citing Jackson v. Veterans Admin. , 768 F.2d 1325 , 1331 (Fed. Cir. 1985) )
• “[T]he board majority did not articulate a sufficient reason for its disbelief of Chauvin’s testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).