Charles E. Blake v. State of Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an expert’s opinion that the defendant deviated from the standard of care suggested negligence rather than deliberate indifference
• a medical disagreement over the proper course of treatment is not deliberate indifference
• expert testimony that the defendant’s steroid treatment was inappropriate and deviated from the standard of care merely “highlight[ed] a difference in medical opinion over the course of treatment[,]” which suggested “negligence rather than deliberate indifference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).