· 2/23/2005
Charles Dorchy v. Kurt Jones, Warden
Citations
- 398 F.3d 783
- 66 Fed. R. Serv. 663
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3085
- 2005 WL 415147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- invocation of the exception \makes the state's present argument that [the] testimony was insubstantial both unpersuasive and inconsistent\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Gilman, Weber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.