Charles Degnan v. Kathleen Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when the court is faced with conflicting panel opinions, the earliest opinion must be followed as it should have controlled the subsequent panel that created the conflict
• explaining that, “when faced with conflicting panel opinions, the earliest opinion must be followed as it should have controlled the subsequent panels that created the conflict” (quoting Mader v. United States, 654 F.3d 794, 800 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).