· 8/11/2000
Charles C. Jackson v. City of St. Louis Thomas A. Astorino
Citations
- 220 F.3d 894
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19186
- 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,248
- 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1070
- 2000 WL 1133833
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing whether employees are sufficiently similarly- situated is easier where the employees have the same supervisor
- refusing to consider an argument that a fact witness was erroneously allowed to testify as an undisclosed expert where the defendant did not object during the witness's testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Loken, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.