Skip to main content
· 8/11/2000

Charles C. Jackson v. City of St. Louis Thomas A. Astorino

Citations

  • 220 F.3d 894
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19186
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,248
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1070
  • 2000 WL 1133833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether employees are sufficiently similarly- situated is easier where the employees have the same supervisor
  • refusing to consider an argument that a fact witness was erroneously allowed to testify as an undisclosed expert where the defendant did not object during the witness's testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Loken, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.