Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even when a petitioner presented the substance of his claim to the state court, the petitioner had to reexhaust that claim if a later-decided Supreme Court opinion cast the claim in a different light
• jurisdiction retained because exhaustion of remedies issue was novel
• when state habeas claim of denial of counsel on appeal was dismissed before the Supreme Court decision in Douglas v. People of State of California the state prisoner must go back into state court to allow the state to consider the ease in light of Douglas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).