Charles Barnard v. Greg Theobald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for further explanation of a percentage reduction justified in part by the case’s lack of complexity
• declining, on de novo review of a district court’s denial of a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, to consider an argument not raised by appellants
• “Under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the award of post judgment interest on a district court judgment is mandatory.”
• “Under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the award of post judgment interest on a district 8 court judgment is mandatory.”
• “Under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the award of post judgment interest on a district court judgment is mandatory.”
• “Under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the award of post judgment interest on a district court judgment is mandatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).