CHARLES AGUON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[i]t has long been established that a judge may find a person who violates a sequestration order in contempt of court\
• noting that sequestration of witnesses \prevent[s] the possibility of one witness shaping his testimony to match that given by other witnesses at the trial\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding that Rule 615 is violated if a witness obtains information about a prior witness's testimony from a third party
• affirming the district court’s conclusion that a witness violated a Rule 615 exclusion order by reading daily trial transcripts
• the district court noted that although he was not a lawyer, “Defendant is no dummy; he is a highly successful real estate developer” with significant litigation experience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).