· 2/19/1993
Charles A. McKinsey v. Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company
Citations
- 986 F.2d 401
- 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2153
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2865
- 1993 WL 42845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, if “personnel other than the plan administrator routinely assume responsibility for answering requests from plan participants and beneficiaries,” their actions “may be imputed to the plan administrator
- “[W]e agree with the district court that Sentry was not the plan administrator and, therefore, cannot be held liable under § 1132(c).”
- “[W]e agree with the district court that Sentry was not the plan administrator and, therefore, cannot be held liable under § 1132(c).”
- \The plan permits a sales representative to withdraw the vested portion of her/his allocations at any time during the course of her/his employment; it does not provide for the systematic deferral of payment.\
- If in practice, company personnel other than the plan administrator routinely assume responsibility for answering requests from plan participants and beneficiaries . . . the actions of the other employees may be imputed to the plan administrator.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Ebel, Brimmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.