Skip to main content
· 2/19/1993

Charles A. McKinsey v. Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company

Citations

  • 986 F.2d 401
  • 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2153
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2865
  • 1993 WL 42845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, if “personnel other than the plan administrator routinely assume responsibility for answering requests from plan participants and beneficiaries,” their actions “may be imputed to the plan administrator
  • “[W]e agree with the district court that Sentry was not the plan administrator and, therefore, cannot be held liable under § 1132(c).”
  • “[W]e agree with the district court that Sentry was not the plan administrator and, therefore, cannot be held liable under § 1132(c).”
  • \The plan permits a sales representative to withdraw the vested portion of her/his allocations at any time during the course of her/his employment; it does not provide for the systematic deferral of payment.\
  • If in practice, company personnel other than the plan administrator routinely assume responsibility for answering requests from plan participants and beneficiaries . . . the actions of the other employees may be imputed to the plan administrator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Ebel, Brimmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.