Charles A. Gulden and Richard R. Sage v. Monroe McCorkle and George Dickerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding state did not violate employees’ Fifth Amendment rights by discharging them for refusing to take polygraphs because “[i]t is the very fact that the testimony was compelled which prevents its use in subsequent proceedings, not any affirmative tender of immunity”
• under Garrity, “It is the very fact that the testimony was compelled which prevents its use in subsequent proceedings, not any affirmative tender of immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).