Charles A. Bane v. Richard G. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the expenditure of public funds [on behalf of an 14 indigent litigant] is proper only when authorized by Congress”
• where a partnership was forced to dissolve, causing a termination in the retirement benefits of a retired partner, dismissal of fiduciary duty claim would alternatively be upheld under the “business judgment rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).