Charlan v. Ambach
Citations
- 91 A.D.2d 736
- 457 N.Y.S.2d 980
- 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Proceeding to revoke physician’s license
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reddy v. State Board for Professional Medical ConductAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-03-11· cited 15×
- Wah Tim Chock v. BittermanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1984-03-01· cited 11×
- Wolf v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-06-02· cited 7×
- Rubin v. Board of Regents of UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-05-24· cited 6×
- Fischman v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-12-08· cited 5×
- Mussalli v. Board of Regents of the University of State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-03-01· cited 4×
- Paul v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-03-22· cited 3×
- Feldman v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-11-01· cited 2×
- Stevens v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-10-27· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wassermann v. Board of Regents of UniversityNew York Court of Appeals· 1962-04-05· cited 17×
- In re O'HaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-08-10· cited 9×
- Holmstrand v. Board of Regents of University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-07-12· cited 9×
- Shmelzer v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-02-11· cited 2×
- Dannenberg v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-07-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.