Chardin v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner didn’t rebut the presumption when the state-law claim had been intertwined with a constitutional claim
• rejecting a Miller claim that challenged a sentencing hearing similar to Petitioner’s
• denying habeas relief under section 2254(d)(2) because “the California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably interpret the facts presented in the state court proceeding when issuing its decision” on whether the removal of a juror violated the Sixth Amendment
• upholding dismissal of a holdout juror who also failed to deliberate
• denying habeas relief under section 2254(d)(2) because “the California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably interpret the facts presented in the state court proceeding when issuing its decision” on whether the. removal of a juror violated the Sixth Amendment
• Miller does not prohibit sentence of life without parole for juvenile convicted 22 of murder and provided an individualized sentencing determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).