Skip to main content
· 6/25/1997

Chard v. Beauty-N-Beast Salon

Citations

  • 941 P.2d 611
  • 148 Or. App. 623
  • 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although the question was close, the plaintiff had submitted sufficient evidence of her employment status to avoid a directed verdict
  • suit for unpaid wages; using state agency’s eleven questions to determine whether requisite right to control existed
  • suit for unpaid wages; using state agency’s eleven questions to determine whether requisite right to control existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Hasel-Ton, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.