· 6/25/1997
Chard v. Beauty-N-Beast Salon
Citations
- 941 P.2d 611
- 148 Or. App. 623
- 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, although the question was close, the plaintiff had submitted sufficient evidence of her employment status to avoid a directed verdict
- suit for unpaid wages; using state agency’s eleven questions to determine whether requisite right to control existed
- suit for unpaid wages; using state agency’s eleven questions to determine whether requisite right to control existed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, De Muniz Hasel-Ton, Haselton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.