Skip to main content
· 5/3/2005

Chappelle v. McCarter

Citations

  • 873 A.2d 458
  • 162 Md. App. 163
  • 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discerning a lack of substantial compliance, in part, because plaintiffs workers’ compensation claim did not constitute seemingly “notice of a claim for unliquidated damages, ... [as] required by CJ § 5-304(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky, Lawrence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.