Chappell v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The test under § 103 is whether in view of the prior art the invention as a whole would have been obvious at the time it was made”
• \The test under Sec. 103 is whether in view of the prior art the invention as a whole would have been obvious at the time it was made\
• “The test of unobviousness is a statutory test and requires comparison of the invention with the prior art in each case.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).