Chappell v. Chappell
Citations
- 124 Wash. 128
- 213 P. 684
- 1923 Wash. LEXIS 851
Syllabus
<p>Wills (58, 59) — Construction—What Law Governs — Intent of Testator — Trust Estates. Notwithstanding the general rule that the law of the domicile governs a will of personal property, the laws of this state will be applied to uphold a charitable devise, valid in this state but invalid in California, the actual domicile of the testator, where he took to, or kept all his property in, this state that it might be administered here, and made his will in, and described himself as being of, this state; in view of Rem. Comp. Stat., § 1415, and of the solicitude of the courts to give effect to the testator’s intent as to charitable bequests.</p>
Judges: Tolman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chappell v. ChappellWashington Supreme Court· 1923-12-28· cited 22×
- Equitable Trust Co. v. WardCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1946-07-31· cited 17×
- Amerige v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-09-30· cited 16×
- Risher v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court· 1938-03-15· cited 12×
- In RE MacADAMS'ESTATEWashington Supreme Court· 1954-11-15· cited 11×
- Gavian v. SteinertWashington Supreme Court· 1954-11-15· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lotzgesell v. CydellWashington Supreme Court· 1911-03-08· cited 22×
- Newport v. NewportWashington Supreme Court· 1892-10-25· cited 18×
- Nuhse v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court· 1918-04-27· cited 13×
- Martin v. MooreWashington Supreme Court· 1908-04-13· cited 11×
- McCullough v. LaumanWashington Supreme Court· 1905-04-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.