Skip to main content
· 4/5/2012

Chappell v. Bilco Co.

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 1110
  • 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1641
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6792
  • 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1089
  • 2012 WL 1123847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that without evidence that infractions committed by other employees were similar to those committed by the plaintiff, the plaintiff “ha[d] not demonstrated that similarly situated employees were treated more favorably”
  • “An employee can make two types of FMLA claims,” identified as “interference” and “retaliaton”
  • “A claim under the FMLA cannot succeed unless the plaintiff can show that he gave his employer adequate and timely notice of his need for leave . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.