· 3/17/2006
Chappell-Johnson v. Powell
Citations
- 440 F.3d 484
- 370 U.S. App. D.C. 162
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6600
- 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,425
- 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1137
- 2005 WL 3867416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff stated a prima facie case by alleging that she was not given a fair opportunity to compete for a vacant position, even though the vacancy was never filled
- noting that “the 7 Supreme Court set[s] out a burden-shifting approach [in McDonnell Douglas] to employment discrimination claims in cases where the plaintiff lacks direct evidence of discrimination”
- “The McDonnell Douglas framework applies to both Title VII and ADEA claims.”
- To state a Title VII claim, a plaintiff must allege facts establishing that “(1) [he] is a member of a protected class; (2) [he] suffered an adverse employment action; and (3) the unfavorable action gives rise to an inference of discrimination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.