Skip to main content
· 3/17/2006

Chappell-Johnson v. Powell

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 484
  • 370 U.S. App. D.C. 162
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6600
  • 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,425
  • 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1137
  • 2005 WL 3867416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff stated a prima facie case by alleging that she was not given a fair opportunity to compete for a vacant position, even though the vacancy was never filled
  • noting that “the 7 Supreme Court set[s] out a burden-shifting approach [in McDonnell Douglas] to employment discrimination claims in cases where the plaintiff lacks direct evidence of discrimination”
  • “The McDonnell Douglas framework applies to both Title VII and ADEA claims.”
  • To state a Title VII claim, a plaintiff must allege facts establishing that “(1) [he] is a member of a protected class; (2) [he] suffered an adverse employment action; and (3) the unfavorable action gives rise to an inference of discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.