Chapman v. Tyson

Citations

• 39 Wash. 523
• 81 P. 1066
• 1905 Wash. LEXIS 895

Syllabus

<p>Deeds—Taking Title in Assumed Name—Validity. Where a man purchases, and takes title to, real estate in the assumed name of his son, with his own funds and for his own use, the title vests in him, and the property does not belong to the son.</p> <p>Same — Conveyance by Assumed Name — Forgery — Validity oe Deed. Where a party purchased, and took title to, real estate in an assumed name, his deeds conveying the same under the same name to parties who dealt with and knew him by such assumed name, are not forgeries and are sufficient to pass title.</p>