Chapman v. Pomainville (In Re Pomainville)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that larceny was inapplicable to the debtor's misappropriation of insurance proceeds for his personal use when there was no proof that the debtor's initial possession of the proceeds was unlawful
• absent an express trust, an action for fraud or defalcation does not arise under § 523(a)(4) even if there otherwise exists a fiduciary relationship between the parties that is recognized by state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).