Chapman v. New York State Division for Youth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming motion to dismiss antitrust claims because plaintiff’s definition of relevant market was too narrow
• affirming motion to dismiss antitrust claims because plaintiff’s definition of relevant market was too narrow
• noting that plaintiff has burden of establishing relevant product market
• analyzing the plaintiff’s alleged product market at the motion to dismiss stage
• \[T]he search for meaning begins with the meaning attached by both parties to the contract language.\
• “[T]he search for meaning begins with the meaning attached by both parties to the contract language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).