Skip to main content
· 9/4/2002

Chapman v. LeMaster

Citations

  • 302 F.3d 1189
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18264
  • 2002 WL 2017139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the [state] courts’ interpretation of the state ... statute is a matter of state law binding on this court”
  • explaining that matters of state law are binding on a federal habeas court
  • explaining that matters of state law are binding on a federal habeas court
  • noting federal courts exercise their independent judgment in deciding claims not decided on the merits by state courts
  • state court’s interpretation of state statutes “is a matter of state law binding on [the federal habeas] court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, McWilliams, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.