· 9/4/2002
Chapman v. LeMaster
Citations
- 302 F.3d 1189
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18264
- 2002 WL 2017139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the [state] courts’ interpretation of the state ... statute is a matter of state law binding on this court”
- explaining that matters of state law are binding on a federal habeas court
- explaining that matters of state law are binding on a federal habeas court
- noting federal courts exercise their independent judgment in deciding claims not decided on the merits by state courts
- state court’s interpretation of state statutes “is a matter of state law binding on [the federal habeas] court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, McWilliams, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.