Supreme Court· 1/6/1936
Chapman v. Hoage
Citations
- 296 U.S. 526
- 56 S. Ct. 333
- 80 L. Ed. 370
- 1936 U.S. LEXIS 954
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employee who elects to proceed against third person must prosecute claim in a manner and to an extent which will avoid prejudice to insurer’s right of subrogation
- injured employee’s election to pursue his remedy against third party did not deprive him of right to compensation from employer under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act where third party action was dismissed because the employee was contributorily negligent
- condition precedent was not met
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.