Skip to main content
· 3/24/2005

Chapman v. Health & Hospitals Corp.

Citations

  • 7 Misc. 3d 933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing orders available under precurser to Rule 573, former Rule 305E
  • defendant’s failure to request remedy specifically under Pa.R.Crim.P. 305(E) didn’t waive issue of discovery violation where defendant had raised the issue at trial and in post-trial motions
  • issues are preserved for appeal if raised at trial and in post-trial motions
  • issues are preserved for appeal if raised at trial and in post-trial motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Solomon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.