Chapman v. Grimm & Grimm, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the evidence did not indicate that the non-litigants encouraged or advised the litigant to bring any action that the litigant was not already contemplating
• noting that attorney's fee awards for frivolous or vexatious motions to modify custody are sufficient to cover the subsequent damages such that a malicious prosecution tort is not needed
• evidence failed to establish that malicious prosecution defendants did more than encourage or advise the party to file the underlying civil proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).