Chapman v. Gaines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs allegations of intentional discrimination was one of the main reasons why plaintiffs state law claims substantially predominated over his ADA claim
• finding state 20 law claims predominated where California accessibility standards provided 21 independent basis for liability on state law claims, plaintiff alleged intentional 22 discrimination, and plaintiff sought damages and fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).