Chapman v. Employment Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• EAB erred in denying benefits on the ground that claimant had voluntarily left work without good cause, because the only issue raised by employer was whether claimant was discharged for misconduct
• “The requisites to an action for slander of title are that the words spoken be 20 false, that they be maliciously spoken and that the plaintiff sustain some special damage as a 21 direct and natural result of their having been spoken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).