Skip to main content
· 4/15/1838

Chapman v. Early

Citations

  • 12 La. 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant was subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Massachusetts where defendant marketed and sold sportswear to Massachusetts consumers over the internet and plaintiff’s claim arose out of defendant’s activities in Massachusetts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.