Skip to main content
· 7/9/1969

Chapman v. Dunn

Citations

  • 414 F.2d 153
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after determining the actual nature of the contended error the appellate court then proceeds utilizing the proper standard of review
  • after determining the actual nature of the contended error the appellate court then proceeds utilizing the proper standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAllister, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.