· 7/9/1969
Chapman v. Dunn
Citations
- 414 F.2d 153
- 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- after determining the actual nature of the contended error the appellate court then proceeds utilizing the proper standard of review
- after determining the actual nature of the contended error the appellate court then proceeds utilizing the proper standard of review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Phillips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.