Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/17/1950
Chapman v. Dorsey
Citations
- 230 Minn. 279
- 16 A.L.R. 2d 1015
- 41 N.W.2d 438
- 1950 Minn. LEXIS 613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that opinions are not precedential on issues “never raised or called to the attention of the court”
- stating that opinions are not precedential on issues “never raised or called to the attention of the court”
- deciding appeal based on the assumption that appellate jurisdiction existed, without actually addressing whether it did, is not precedential regarding existence of appellate jurisdiction
- stating that opinions are not prece-dential on issues “never raised or called to the attention of the court”
- stating that issues that were never “raised or called to the attention of the court” do not represent binding law
- stating that an opinion deciding an appeal based on the assumption that appellate jurisdiction existed is not precedential regarding the existence of appellate jurisdiction where the existence of appellate jurisdiction was not addressed by the court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1985-11-26· cited 331×
- Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1956-05-09· cited 116×
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-02-17· cited 62×
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-07-14· cited 51×
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-01-11· cited 46×
- Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-07-25· cited 40×
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-01-23· cited 28×
- Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-02-17· cited 27×
- State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-09-16· cited 27×
- In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-01-31· cited 24×
- In Re Estate of JanecekSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-05-18· cited 21×
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-02-21· cited 19×
- Patten v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 18×
- Willeck v. WilleckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-04-10· cited 17×
- Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-02-18· cited 16×
- Shema v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-02-27· cited 15×
- Phillips v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-06-30· cited 15×
- Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-31· cited 15×
- Steeves v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-11-30· cited 10×
- Knutson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-02· cited 10×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-01-16· cited 19×
- Bennett v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1878-07-01· cited 18×
- Sundberg v. GoarSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-05-13· cited 15×
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-12-16· cited 15×
- In re GrundysenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-06-01· cited 11×
- Patterson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-02-23· cited 7×
- Boen v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1898-05-03· cited 4×
- Lewis v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-12-02· cited 4×
Other cases named Chapman v. Dorsey
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.