Chapman v. Auto Owners Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in deciding whether to exclude testimony, the trial court should determine the spoliator's culpability and the prejudice caused by the destruction of evidence
• stating that in deciding whether to exclude testimony, the trial court should determine the spoliator’s culpability and the prejudice caused by the destruction of evidence
• destruction of electrical parts and other items removed after fire before opponent's opportunity to examine same, necessitates remedial action
• “dismissal should be reserved for cases where a party has maliciously destroyed relevant evidence with the sole purpose of precluding an adversary from examining that relevant evidence”
• con-taming extensive discussions of sanction review considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).