Skip to main content
· 11/16/2007

Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonald

Citations

  • 985 So. 2d 914
  • 2007 Ala. LEXIS 251
  • 2007 WL 3409013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the principal test for comparing causes of action in a res judicata determination is whether the primary right and duty or wrong are the same in both actions
  • stating res judicata applies not only to the precise legal theory of claim pre- sented in the prior case, but to all legal theories and claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative facts
  • providing under Alabama law, the elements of res judicata are: “(1) a prior judgment on the merits, (2) rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) with substantial identity of the parties, and (4) with the same cause of action presented in both actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: See

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.