Chaplin v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Following the reasoning of Volkswagenwerk, several federal courts have authorized service under Rule 4(f)(3) on domestic counsel as involuntary agents for their clients abroad.”
• allowing service on domestic counsel for defendants located in Russia and the Czech Republic
• “Of Tenza’s proposed methods of service, substituted service upon Mr. Zhukov’s domestic attorneys is the least problematic. Such service would be complete within the United States and would therefore not trigger the Hague Service Convention”
• “If service is effected domestically, then the Hague Service Convention does not apply.”
• collecting cases of . involuntary agency under Rule 4(f)(3)
• “[I]f service is properly effected under Rule 4(e)(2)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).