Skip to main content
· 7/1/1996

CHAPLAIN SERVICES

Citations

  • 21 I. & N. Dec. 578

Syllabus

CHAPLAIN SERVICES, INC., 21 I&N Dec. 578 (BIA 1996) ID 3292 (PDF) (1) In an application for recognition, an applicant must respond to and successfully rebut an adverse recommendation made by the district director, even when such recommendation has been made in a prior recognition proceeding involving the applicant. (2) Denial of the applicant's recognition request is justified by unrebutted allegations in the district director's recommendation made in prior recognition proceedings that the applicant's personnel supplied clients with misinformation that the applicant improperly submitted Notices of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative (Forms G-28) on behalf of a purportedly associated attorney who never performed services that the applicant's clients had been charged excessive amounts for services in spite of the applicant's fee list which reflects nominal charges and that the member of the applicant's staff upon whose expertise the applicant relies has been the subject of complaints for the unauthorized practice of law.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.