Chapin v. Massachusetts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding pendent jurisdiction proper where federal and state claims were based on closing of the Cleveland Press newspaper
• stating only “overwhelming interests in judicial economy” allow courts to decide state-law claims once federal claims are dismissed
• affirming a district court’s continued exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in part because “the district court was not called upon to interpret some abstruse Ohio legal doctrine”
• both claims turned on “whether defendants had the intent to interfere with plaintiffs’ Job Security Agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).