Chapin v. C. & E. I. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is enough if they were both liable for the same injury”
• \It is enough if they were both liable for the same injury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manthei v. Heimerdinger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1947-10-09· cited 41×
• Dettloff v. Hammond, Standish & Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1917-03-29· cited 25×
• Hartigan v. Dickson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-10-29· cited 23×
• Cherney v. Soldinger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-10-09· cited 20×
• McClure v. Lence
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1952-01-05· cited 17×
• Guth v. Vaughan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1923-12-26· cited 17×
• McClure v. Lence
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1953-03-04· cited 16×
• Wallner v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1909-10-07· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ward v. Stout
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1863-04-15· cited 30×
• Goss v. Ellison
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-02-28· cited 23×
• Mount Carbon Coal & Railroad v. Andrews
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1870-01-15· cited 7×